The existing studies show no high relationships between Conscientiousness and you will narcissism (Miller mais aussi al

Professionals

There have been 437 (270 girls) users, who have been employed through in public areas available websites. Their indicate many years was 23 years (SD = 5.96). Players was indeed asked to complete a set of surveys a few of that are not relevant towards the current analysis. The subjects provided its advised concur to your release of the sample results getting look motives, and all have been offered views into the general outcome of the analysis. The fresh new dataset analysed within the newest study is available at the

Methods

Insecure narcissism are mentioned toward Hypersensitive Narcissism Level by the Hendin and you can Cheek (1997) regarding Polish interpretation (select Czarna et al. 2014). They includes ten things that have an effective Likert-such as for instance reaction level from (strongly differ) in order to 5 (highly concur).

Grandiose narcissism is actually reviewed with the confirmed Shine adaptation (Bazinska and you may Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your own Narcissistic Character Inventory (Raskin and you can Hall 1979). What exactly had been chose basing into the factor study (loadings exceeding .40) and you will represented the second subscales of your NPI: Expert (11 points), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and Exhibitionism http://www.datingranking.net/indiancupid-review (11). Participants ranked their level of approval of each and every report using an effective Likert-type response style, from one (will not connect with me) so you can 5 (applies to me personally). The sum of issues creates a directory out of grandiose narcissism. It has been revealed has just the Likert style NPI manifests similar build authenticity and you may quite improved precision to the fresh pushed-possibilities format (Miller ainsi que al. 2018a).

The top Five try analyzed that have Polish type (Strus et al. 2014) of the Around the globe Character Goods Pool – Big Five Element Size (BFAS; DeYoung et al. 2007). This can be an one hundred-goods way of measuring characteristic domains (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you will Openness/Intellect) plus the one or two all the way down-buy areas of for every single domain name (Volatility, Withdrawal, Compassion, Complimentary, Industriousness, Orderliness, Love, Assertiveness, Intellect, and you can Transparency). Members was asked to help you price how much cash the newest statements is relevant on it to the a beneficial Likert-method of scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (firmly concur).

Performance

Very first, we looked at the brand new correlations between two variations away from narcissism and you can identification traits along with domains and you may issues (Table 1). One another sort of narcissism coordinated with character traits into the a similar answer to earlier lookup (age.grams. Miller et al. 2011). Particularly, vulnerable narcissism is actually absolutely synchronised that have Neuroticism, and negatively associated with the Agreeableness and you can Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and Conscientiousness, and you may adversely which have Neuroticism and you will Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).